SEE ALSO :Billions gobbled up by Nairobi County, audit reveals
Ouko has also questioned why the county invested Sh108 million in a new company for provision of a Wide Area Network connectivity and internet bandwidth instead of utilising the existing similar infrastructures in the county offered by other telecommunication service providers such as Safaricom and Telcom. The national government is in the process of doing a similar project for the entire country, and according to the report, expenditure on a similar project by the county may amount to duplication of resources. The report has also poked holes on the renovation and refurbishment of Siaya County Referral Hospital (SCRH) whose sum contract was agreed at Sh119.8 million. The reports says Sh51 million may have been lost. Renovation of wards - doors, ceilings, asbestos roofs at the kitchen and amenity were not replaced, according to the report. The whereabouts of Sh14 million meant for completion of a maternity wing at Bondo sub-county Hospital is also questioned in the report.SEE ALSO :MCAs face off with governor on push to change county budget
According to the Auditor General, hardboard double doors were fixed instead of hardwood panel doors. The roofs were leaking and locally made steel doors were also not of British standard as specified in the bill of quantity. Even though the county government initiated the construction of county headquarter as its flagship project in 2013/2014 financial year, the proposed project has not fully been implemented. The management was, however, not able to provide inspection and acceptance committee report for audit examination to justify payment of Sh21 million to a consultant. Governor Cornel Rasanga’s government had budgeted to procure two fire engines at Sh113.6 million. This budget was funded but analysis of the IFMIS payment details revealed that an amount of Sh83.9 million was spent on the procurement of the fire engine. “The management has not explained how the balance of Sh29.6 million which had been disbursed out of Sh113.6 million was utilised,” said the report.SEE ALSO :Farmers to wait longer for better maize prices
The management could not also explain how imprest issued and surrendered amounting to Sh11.5 million was not adequately supported with relevant supporting documents. About 27 officers were said to be holding imprest of over Sh500, 000 each, all totaling to Sh62.6 million which had not been accounted for as at 30 June, 2017. The propriety of the expenditure of Sh20 million paid to an advocate as legal fees could not be confirmed. Also in the report, the legality of the expenditure of Sh8.7 million on payment for insurance providers.


