SEE ALSO :Artists’ anger as Copyright Board distributes Sh80m royalties
And this is the crux of the matter and that makes MCSK’s claim of issuing the highest disbursement difficult to verify. On one hand, the royalties received were reportedly collected over two months from “public performance” of MCSK registered members’ content and distributed through a general distribution formula, which means all artistes get an equal disbursement. This could, as MCSK chief executive says, indeed be the highest distribution made from two-month collections of this category However, MCSK has failed to give a breakdown of the collections made along the various categories and parameters. MCSK collects fees in terms of licensing to public premises that play music. The latest schedule published this year entails 27 wide-ranging categories that include aircraft, roadshows and elevators. Licence fees range from Sh5,000 per year to a percentage of income made such as the case for concerts. The problem that continues to pit MCSK against its registered artistes has been the latter’s failure to provide accurate and up to date data on the licence fees it collects from the various categories in each reporting period. This raises eyebrows given the fact that licensing is continuous and MCSK has in recent times engaged the help of the police to crack down on public places that have not paid the required fees. In 2016, the CMO was put on the spot by music group Elani that claimed Sh16,000 royalties paid to them that year was not reflective of the massive airplay its songs were receiving. MCSK later paid the group Sh300,000 as compensation after the issue caused an uproar with other artists sharing similar complaints.We are undertaking a survey to help us improve our content for you. This will only take 1 minute of your time, please give us your feedback by clicking HERE. All responses will be confidential.



