- Reuters 18th Sep 2019 14:05:49 GMT +0300
SEE ALSO :MPs plot how they will keep their jobs
In March this year, High Court ruled that the law setting limits on interest rates charged on loans by banks is unconstitutional. The three-Judge bench however suspended the implementation giving the regulator one-year period to put in place appropriate mechanisms. A petition by Boniface Oduor involved the constitutionality of the provisions of the banking (amendment) act number 25 of 2016, which introduced section 33b into the banking act.For More of This and Other Stories, Grab Your Copy of the Standard Newspaper.
The court found out that although the responsibility of Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) in setting and publishing the central bank rate is a function of formulating monetary policy, the petitioner did not demonstrate to the satisfaction of the court that the section relating to interest rate capping falls within the purview of monetary policy. “For that reason, the court cannot fault the National Assembly in legislating a provision on interest rate ceiling. In arriving at the decision, the court gives deference to the principle of the presumption of constitutionality of legislation.”SEE ALSO :IEBC to set date for Kibra mini poll
The judges found the provisions of sections 33 b (1) and (2) of the banking act to be vague, imprecise and ambiguous.We are undertaking a survey to help us improve our content for you. This will only take 1 minute of your time, please give us your feedback by clicking HERE. All responses will be confidential.



