If the court decides that Title VII protections apply to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees, such a decision would essentially extend basic civil rights protections to those groups.
Kerri Kupec, a Justice Department spokeswoman, disputed the Shepards’ characterization of its position on employment rights for transgender people. Solicitor General Noel J. Francisco, who represented the Trump administration’s position on the issue, argued that Congress, not the courts, should change the law, she noted.
But Mr. Francisco also said that while Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on sex, it “does not bar discrimination because of transgender status” because the definition of sex in the law refers only to “unequal treatment of men and women in the workplace.”
The Shepards said in their letter that a history of prohibitions that discriminate against gay people — including on marriage, military service, adoption and employment without fear of being fired for their sexual orientation — essentially paved the way for the type of violence that the Shepard-Byrd act is meant to prosecute.
“Such blatant discrimination encourages bullying, vandalism and other acts of violence, encouraging close-minded people to push harder against those they consider ‘different’ because they don’t fit their preconceived notions of ‘same,’” the Shepards wrote.
“Our son, Matt, was the result of that discrimination and violence when he was beaten brutally and left to die,” they wrote.
Two men were convicted in Mr. Shepard’s killing and are each serving two consecutive life sentences without parole.