EDITORIAL: Review recall of MPs’ guards

The unfolding controversy over withdrawal of security personnel attached to politicians is not unsurprising.

Nobody takes kindly when privileges are cut. And this is not the first time.

At the peak of brutal fights between the Jubilee government and the National Super Alliance (Nasa) soon after the 2017 elections, security guards attached to several Opposition members were taken away. That was ill-advised.

In both cases, we disagree with the manner in which the decision was made and executed. It’s being done selectively and in a manner that reeks of mischief and vendetta. It’s impulsive, punitive and malicious.

However, in principle, we are opposed to the practice of according politicians police protection.

It’s not desirable and cannot be justified. Unfortunately, what had started as a privilege has been turned into a right.

MPs, governors and now even members of county assemblies are demanding security provided by the State.

Providing security to politicians is a misnomer. First, it ties down many police officers to individuals, leaving only a few to take on general duties, which partly explains rampant crime.

Secondly, the politicians misuse the officers, often turning them into messengers, which is demeaning and objectionable. Thirdly, the politicians are well paid; they should pay for their security.

Insecurity is a real threat. Citizens live under constant threat of attack from criminals.

Most neighbourhoods in the urban areas organise their own security and pay dearly for it. But the politicians imagine they are special. This is sheer misuse of position.

However, taking away security guards from certain politicians selectively is disingenuous, problematic and creates a context for ruthless political tussling.

If the National Police Service is withdrawing politicians’ security guards, let it do it for all of them.