The lawsuit against Ms. Kim comes on the heels of a landmark ruling this month in a civil suit filed on behalf of two South Korean prisoners of war from the 1950-53 Korean War. With the help of conservative lawyers, the men, who spent decades in the North before escaping to the South, won their case when a Seoul court ordered Kim Jong-un and North Korea to compensate them for the forced labor they suffered while in the North.
Under South Korea’s Constitution, North Korea and its people are technically part of South Korea. And in South Korea, civil lawsuits can be tried without the defendants in court. The ruling in the P.O.W. case ruling was also largely symbolic because there was no way South Korea can force Mr. Kim and North Korea to pay the compensation.
Still, it encouraged politically active conservative lawyers to file or consider other lawsuits against North Korea over a host of issues, such as the widespread abuse of human rights.
Prosecutors have yet to decide whether to seek criminal charges against Ms. Kim. But given past practices, they will most likely drop the case after studying the complaint.
In the past, activists had sued top North Korean leaders, like Mr. Kim’s father, Kim Jong-il, over incidents like the sinking of a South Korean navy ship in 2010. But prosecutors indicted no one.