Joseph J. Salvo, the chief demographer for the Department of City Planning, acknowledged that the rate of population growth in the city has slackened, but challenged the latest estimate’s bottom line.
“There is a very real possibility that the population did not decline,” he said on Thursday. “We think the population is higher than 8.4 million.”
One reason, he said, is the change in methodology meant to make one of the American Community Survey questions less ambiguous. Instead of asking people born abroad when they arrived in the United States, the bureau based its latest count on a more specific question: It asked where they lived a year ago.
“Our feeling is that the number for net international migration is likely too low because the new method tends to produce a lower figure,” Dr. Salvo said.
He said the new method, while more conservative, may prove to be more accurate.
“The estimation methodology for net international migration has changed significantly, resulting in a revised 2010-2017 international migration estimate that is 31 percent lower than the previous vintage,” a Planning Department analysis said.
“While the previous vintage estimated international net migration for the city at 624,000,” the analysis added, “the latest vintage provides a lower estimate of 431,000 over the same period, which are likely too low.”
“The Census Bureau’s methodology is not robust enough to precisely quantify the magnitude of these year-to-year changes,” the City Planning Department’s analysis of the latest estimate said.