The company has strongly resisted naming Mr. Zuckerberg in the F.T.C.’s settlement as personally liable for privacy violations, according to the two people with knowledge of the talks.
The company has offered what it has described to the F.T.C. as a new corporate governance structure built around privacy, the people said. The promises include the creation of an independent committee, which could include members of Facebook’s board of directors, to oversee privacy policy. The committee would meet quarterly.
Facebook also agreed to the creation of a position for an independent assessor, the people said. The assessor would be appointed by the F.T.C. and the privacy committee. That person would determine whether the company is complying with a new F.T.C. privacy order as well as the company’s own privacy policy for users. The assessor would give biannual reports to the company and F.T.C.
The company would also designate a compliance officer internally at the executive ranks. There was discussion at one time that Mr. Zuckerberg could be given that role, but it is unclear if he would ultimately do so, according to one of the people familiar with the talks.
When the company announced putting aside the $5 billion to pay for potential penalties, it said that “the matter remains unresolved, and there can be no assurance as to the timing or the terms of any final outcome.”
A $5 billion penalty would be far higher than the F.T.C.’s current record against a tech company. The agency fined Google $22.5 million in 2012 for misleading users about how some of its tools were tracking users.
But that amount would still be a small percentage of the company’s $56 billion in annual revenue. Despite all of the public scrutiny the company has faced in the past year, Facebook said last week that its revenue increased 26 percent in the first quarter, to $15 billion, from a year earlier.