People who filed the complaints with the Civilian Complaint Review Board can now learn the outcome, whereas it was near impossible before. Additionally, we now have a broad-enough data set to discern what some of the norms are for police discipline.
When Daniel Pantaleo, the officer that put Eric Garner in a fatal chokehold — when his disciplinary records were leaked, there was no way to tell if he was a bad guy who had just been a cowboy uncontrolled all these years, or if his activity was relatively normal. Now we can look at the data and see what the norms are and what the range of behavior is.
What will the set of records actually show?
Anything you do with this data is going to require further reporting. There are lots of questions about what the data is; there’s some missing pieces.
Generally, people are going to be interested in, who are the officers with the most complaints? What precincts have the most trouble?
I think the big question that everybody wants to answer is, how effective is the police disciplinary process? I think we can kind of assume the answer is “not very.” But why it isn’t, I think that question is a lot harder to answer.
How will you use these records in your reporting?
It’s now something that you can fold into any story: This officer has X amount of complaints.
It’s a quick way to have a fuller picture of an officer’s history on the job. Not to say that complaints are evidence of guilt — a lot of times they are not. I think a lot of people are going to find out just how much authority police have.
There will be cases where an officer did in fact do a thing that is alleged but that is fully in the police’s power. I think that is jarring to a lot of people.